Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (43897)	5/12/2004 2:24:33 PM
From: Paul van Wijk	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793718

But it would require a regime change, which the Pals, like all the Arabs, seem unable to do on their own, ever. I agree with that. But it also require the will of the US. If only Bush had 10% of his commitment to build a democratic Iraq, to solve the Israelian-Palestinan conflict it would be a peace of cake. I don't want to take side in this conflict. But I can understand that the Palestinians are frustrated to the bone, and I also understand the arrogance of the Israelis to do whatever they like, because the US will back them unconditionally. I can also understand that no single Arab believes Bush when he speak about his commitment to solve this problem. This is going on for so long, frustration has been building up for decades. If Bush want to win the hearts and minds in the Arab world, solving this conflict is by far the most effective way of doing this. The problem is that the Palestinians have no oil. Regards, Paul