Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: calgal who wrote (575195)	5/13/2004 10:56:52 PM
From: calgal	Respond to of 769670

James Lileks America likes Rumsfeld, and the Dems can't take it URL:http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0504/lileks.html

To: calgal who wrote (575195)	5/13/2004 10:57:05 PM
From: calgal	Respond to of 769670

URL:http://www.jewishworldreview.com/toons/asay/asay1.asp

To: calgal who wrote (575195)	5/13/2004 11:05:44 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

May 13, 2004. 07:54 PM War costs exceed estimates, Wolfowitz admits WASHINGTON (AP) — Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will cost more than $50 billion (U.S.) next year, a top Defence Department official told Congress today in the government's clearest description yet of the conflicts' price tags. The remarks by Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz edged the administration toward critics' estimates that combat will cost closer to $75 billion in the budget year that starts Oct. 1. White House budget chief Joshua Bolten earlier this year had said that next year's spending would probably be $50 billion. Wolfowitz also seemed to open the door to compromise over the White House's unusual request for full control over the first $25 billion for the wars. Congress is expected to provide the money, but members of the Senate Armed Services Committee lambasted the unfettered flexibility the proposal would give the president. "Our forefathers would have scorned such arrogance as has been demonstrated by this administration in this request," said Senator Robert Byrd (D - W.Va.) Committee Chairman John Warner (R - Va.) said legislators must ``maintain our oversight" of the money. With monthly war expenditures approaching $5 billion, next year's total cost "is $50 billion to $60 billion," Wolfowitz told the panel. "If you look at our operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, it's a big bill." On Wednesday, President George W. Bush formally proposed an initial $25 billion for next year's military activities in Iraq and Afghanistan. Administration officials had earlier said they would seek no money until next year because of questions about allied contributions and the stability of Iraq. Wolfowitz told senators that the next request for funds will come early next year, and "it will surely be much larger than $25 billion." That means the total in 2005 would be more than $50 billion. The war spending is on top of the $402 billion Bush has proposed for the Defence Department for 2005. Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Congress has provided $165 billion to the Pentagon for Iraq, Afghanistan and anti-terrorism efforts at home and abroad, excluding what Bush wants for next year. The initial $25 billion is meant to help the army and other services pay for operations and maintenance for the first months of next year. Those expenses traditionally include repairs, fuel, food and other similar necessities. But that excludes other needs, such as paying salaries of reservists called to duty and replacing destroyed and worn out equipment. thestar.com