SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (86733)5/14/2004 11:42:43 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
As Bill alluded, the process goes something like this:

1. Messageboard poster criticizes a public company or its management.
2. Said public company doesn't like its dirty laundry being discussed in public and, erroneously, thinks the best way to shut said poster up and deter others from seeing the light is to sue him/her.
3. Said poster (defendant), rather than get intimidated, gets infuriated and vows to fight said company (plaintiff) to the death.
4. Defendant calls various attorneys and gets average quote for $10,000 retainer.
5. Defendant, although stunned by the retainer, is still determined to teach the plaintiff a lesson.
6. Many many months pass, defendant forks over tens of thousands to pay for filing and answering various motions, yet the merits of the case are never discussed.
7. Meanwhile, plaintiff's messageboard becomes overrun by "bashers" who figure -- almost always correctly -- that where's there's smoke there's fire.
8. Plaintiff, having likely milked every last penny from dumping his stock, eventually agrees to drop lawsuit.
9. Defendant loses tens of thousands and is no better off than if he just filed pro se to get the lawsuit tossed out on jurisdiction.
10. Plaintiff's lawsuit, rather than shut up critics, ends up attracting the SEC's attention, leading to the company and it's management being nailed for securities fraud.

Verdict: Plaintiff and defendant lose; attorneys for both sides win.

- Jeff



To: rrufff who wrote (86733)5/14/2004 12:21:07 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Respond to of 122087
 
Sorry, didn't mean to sound that bleak. One really positive thing was learning about stuff like... Pink Sheet Trading Floor Specialists and CEOs who wonder aloud (on a Court witness stand) if "Cash Flow" is an accounting term. AZNT was a wacky one, for sure; the joys and hilarities of msg board silly stocks. <g>