Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (44326)	5/14/2004 10:37:34 AM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793840

Good point. So what do you think of Teddy Kennedy's remark? M

To: Lane3 who wrote (44326)	5/14/2004 11:02:12 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793840

I find it absurd that having done so in a case where the family is critical of the President is somehow biased. I would accept it as followup on page A-6. The "Times" ran it in the middle of the front page above the fold. With all the heat before the jump. The agenda was obvious. It was the way it was framed and played.

To: Lane3 who wrote (44326)	5/14/2004 11:16:41 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793840

We should keep an open mind on the Berg story. There may be more to it. Can you imagine if Berg was looking for the ticket home or to Turkey and the govt did not provide it? Some middle level MI, CIA types might be cya right now. We dont know the full story yet. This deserves to be investigated. Hopefully the above is not the case. "Berg's own grief-deranged kin." its grief stricken, not deranged. Please be more careful with your choice of words. <g> or say imo <g>