Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (22521)	5/14/2004 12:55:40 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

The only "sides to the story" are those eye-witnessed by John and his men (the truth), and those made up by political opponents hoping to destroy his reputation with slander. I know Bushies are terrified about running their AWOL Bush against a true combat hero, but that's just the reality they're going to have to accept. To slander Kerry on his war record is lousy, dishonest and un-patriotic. Besides, look at the polls, it hasn't worked. Going negative does not seem to help Bush at all. Just the opposite. He has a 51% disapproval rating now thanks to all his negativity. No accident that today Bush started running positive ads.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (22521)	5/14/2004 3:00:41 PM
From: BEEF JERKEY	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

I don't think what happened 35 years ago makes him a better candidate Your in total denial. What happened does matter - it goes to the question of character. That’s why these "chickenhawks" are really a pathetic bunch worthy of contempt. Too sissy to do the deed themselves Eg. Bush weaseled his way out of 'Nam but has no problem sending other people's children off to die in some cockamamie war in the middle east that has spun badly out of control. Bush talks tough "bring em on" but was passed out at the country club bar while Kerry was "takin' care of business"