Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (44436)	5/14/2004 5:35:17 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 793843

"Between my nuance and your inferences, is seems unlikely that my arguments will ever reach you." Well, considering that I am mostly a straight shooter, I say exactly what I mean & I'm a stick to the facts kind of guy, I'd have to say that you nuance your nuancing with too much nuance. For you to claim I used any inference at all in this series of posted is to nuance reality IMO. I have no problems following almost everyone's POV, even the nuancers. Why are you so different from everyone else I wonder? "If you pick bits and snatches of a any multidimensional argument..." Could you show me what I left out that altered the meaning of what I commented on one iota? Did anything I didn't comment on make any significant difference to the specific points I made? Your posts may be multidimensional, but I can follow specific lines of thought as good as anyone. IMO, I think you do it to give you cover so you can claim you didn't really mean what you really said. Anytime anyone calls you out on things you said, you typically claim that you meant something else. That gets quite frustrating when it happens a lot. Why do you think I have been asking you specifically what you meant so much lately? Why do you think I have been asking you to provide specifics to support your POV? Until then, I stand by what I said.