Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (22672)	5/14/2004 9:29:20 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Zell Miller tells the truth: Sen. Miller: Kerry a National Security Threat In the most scathing attack yet against Sen. John Kerry delivered by one of his peers, Sen. Zell Miller warned yesterday that the likely Democratic presidential nominee would be a threat to U.S. national security if elected. Reacting to claims by Kerry ally Sen. Ted Kennedy that "Saddam's torture chambers have reopened under U.S. management," Miller told radio host Sean Hannity: "Those twin senators from Massachusetts are the co-chairmen of the Handwringers of America - the HWA. And they continued to bash this country. "Both of them," Miller said, "voted against every major weapons system that won the Cold War. And Senator Kerry has made it very clear that his national security policy is to vacillate and retreat and hand over the leadership to the United Nations." The Georgia Democrat warned that the prospect of Kerry's election posed such a serious threat to U.S. national security that it could ultimately cost the U.S. its freedom. "Here's a man who says he's against outsourcing, and yet he wants to outsource our foreign policy - that's the most dangerous outsourcing of all," Miller charged. He then added, "This man wants to be the leader of the Free World? Free for how long?"

To: mph who wrote (22672)	5/14/2004 11:19:56 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

If you read history, the Shah was pushed out by the Nixonites, that is he was abandoned by them and was being pushed out. Events were already in progress when Carter took over. Carter was a victim of a lot of bad luck. You must also be aware that Reagan's people in the oil-CIA business arranged for the Iranian hostages NOT to be released until after Carter was out of office. That is where the term "October Surprise" came from. We have seen similar abuses with Iran-Contra and the energy crises now with Prince Bandar and the Kuwaitis. Much of it in secret but we know from Iran-Contra what can be done.