Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (23127)	5/16/2004 3:04:37 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 81568

Bush is starving the beast and costing us in the long run. It's as if the Bush administration is so anti big government that they are taking the approach of killing the government by overspending. This route will cause us to default and bankrupt the country. This would make conservatives happy I guess...to kill the beast that they despise. But only a few benefit from this strategy, while the masses will be hurt deeply and the country's economy will be thrown a rat hole to achieve their ends. Social Security is something that goes against the grain of the conservatives. They hate the idea of having to provide subsistence support to seniors after they have given the best of their years to the country. I mean SS is barely enough to survive on. It's a third world existence for millions of seniors. What will the Republican's propose? Opening up the basements of churches...to feed the hungry after SS and the rest of the government lay in shambles? They are for faith based initiatives...but against Social Security and dignity for our seniors. Yep you can get your soup while we preach our religion to you. With the higher father in charge of the war in Iraq...why not put him charge of Social Security too? Orca