SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Orcastraiter who wrote (23241)5/16/2004 8:28:01 PM
From: Kenneth E. PhillippsRespond to of 81568
 
"Bush emerges as vain rather than confident, a man whose major concern is to show he has "cojones". Yet his self-confidence is so frail that Brent Scowcroft, his father's former national security adviser, largely shut up in public after cautioning of the risks of war - not because he changed his view but because he and Bush snr did not want to injure the son's self-confidence."

smh.com.au



To: Orcastraiter who wrote (23241)5/16/2004 8:29:11 PM
From: WaynersRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 81568
 
The Scowcroft warning was better put on a turban and bow to Mecca everyday rather than risk a single life trying to defend the world from Satanistic terrorists.



To: Orcastraiter who wrote (23241)5/16/2004 8:29:12 PM
From: Kenneth E. PhillippsRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Scowcroft wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times warning of the risks of war in Iraq. He was told by Bush Sr. to keep quiet because he was hurting the self confidence of Bush Jr.



To: Orcastraiter who wrote (23241)5/16/2004 8:37:01 PM
From: Kenneth E. PhillippsRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Brent Scowcroft is the source of major embarrassment for the administration when he authors an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal arguing against the need to remove Saddam Hussein from power. He says that the toppling of Saddam's regime would destabilize the Middle East and thus “turn the whole region into a cauldron and destroy the War on Terror.” Noting that “there is scant evidence to tie Saddam to terrorist organizations, and even less to the Sept. 11 attacks,” he calls on Bush to abandon his designs on Saddam Hussein and instead refocus his foreign policy on the war on terrorism. [Wall Street Journal] It is suggested that Scowcroft's criticisms probably reflect the feelings of the President's father. The Los Angeles Times reports: “Several former officials close to Scowcroft said they doubted he would have gone public with that posture without clearing the move first with the senior Bush, heightening questions about the latter's view on confronting Iraq. The former president has not commented publicly, which has only fed speculation.” [Los Angeles Times, 8/17/02]