Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (188684)	5/17/2004 4:32:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578556

do you acknowledge there are or there are not photos or movies of Private England screwing more than her abusive boyfriend? There are at least 1800 photos that I know about but haven't seen. Do any of those show Private England? I don't know. But think of that number. 1800 photos. That is not a bunch of juveniles making a souvenier. There are hours of photo processing, burning CDs, or just filing the pictures. Nobody does that with their photos of Niagra Falls, no matter how much sex they had and wanted to remember. This was a major organized undertaking just to document the torture, much less carry it out. TP

To: steve harris who wrote (188684)	5/18/2004 11:57:51 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578556

Something in your post kept nagging at me. do you acknowledge there are or there are not photos or movies of Private England screwing more than her abusive boyfriend? In the articles that you linked it did mention that there were photos and movies of Private England and her boyfriend. But it also said that they were confiscated from her private footlocker. Why would these pictures be included with the official torture pictures? (unless they were having sex among the prisoners, is that the case?) It would seem to me that they are a distraction. By having the senators consentrate on porn they wouldn't be able to use their three hour viewing window very effectively. When they find out who included them on the disk of 1800 photos congress will be a lot closer to knowing who is trying to cover up this mess. Actively misleading the investigation could be grounds for criminal charges, not just firing. TP