Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (45016)	5/17/2004 10:13:48 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793592

The way I look at it, if there's a man who is so purely evil that the cops are afraid of him, then he's what I call a "man who needs killing" and I wouldn't blink twice if someone killed him, nor lift a finger to harm a hair on their head. But if years pass and he's no longer dangerous then he's no longer a man who needs killing. Then let the law do its job, or if not, I'd still look the other way if one of his victims decided to finish him off. But you don't send a posse or a lynch mob after a man who's not a clear and present threat. I can't say it any clearer than that. The law can be bent or ignored when it's absolutely necessary for the good of the community as a whole, but otherwise, you go by the rules. The law serves man, but man also serves the law.