Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (121881)	5/18/2004 9:41:43 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer, What are you talking about? I am talking about submissions that are on AMD site that are not reflected yet on Spec site, and therefore not on Aces SpecMine. Regular spec submission (not rate) for a single processor would be useful, but AMD (or anybody else) has not submitted or revealed it yet. We can talk about it when it is released. As of today, Opteron has the highest 2 processor SpecInt score, and SpecInt is a good predictor of most of the server centric apps. Joe

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (121881)	5/18/2004 9:49:34 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer, AMD 250 2P SpecInt = 37.7 Could you show us the 2P Xeon that outperforms? Why is a 3.2 GHz 2MB Xeon "slow"? It's the fastest Xeon available. Something tells me you didn't read Joe's post closely, and you didn't follow all the links. As for your 4P FUD, AMD 850 4P SpecInt = 68.5. The best 4P Xeon on the Ace's link = 57.2. The best 4P Itanium on the Ace's link = 64.2 Where I come from, 68.5 > 57.2 and 68.5 > 64.2. Do you need to rely on old data to spread your FUD, Elmo? As for FP, a 4P 846 from Appro scores 52.5 peak. Xeon 4P systems are mired in the low 30s. Amazing how much misinformation you spread, Elmer. Doug