Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (576547)	5/18/2004 11:34:47 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

< My actual guess is that the dress was daring, but not that daring. Maybe some faint nippleness was visible, and it was enhanced. > I agree. The sheerness of the dress doesn't look right. Why doesn't her arm show throw the same material? Del

To: E who wrote (576547)	5/19/2004 12:30:41 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

ROTFLOL.... The original unretouched boob girl... The dress was a stupid idea. The illumination comes from the flash that was used. When a sheer material is against a surface the surface reflects back through with lots of detail. The dark areas are where the dress is hanging loosely. And LOL, notice the panties in full view.... At least wearing panties shows only a semi brain mal-function. this is original full view. johnkerry.homeip.net [ 4111 ] > jhead kerry_boobsL.jpg File name : kerry_boobsL.jpg File size : 62264 bytes File date : 2004:05:17 11:34:27 Resolution : 300 x 960 Jpeg process : Baseline Cropped and enlarged with simple smoothing and 75% quality save. johnkerry.homeip.net File name : kerry_boobsLc.jpg File size : 69475 bytes File date : 2004:05:17 11:37:57 Resolution : 718 x 869 Jpeg process : Baseline Comment : CREATOR: XV Version 3.10a Rev: 12/29/94 Quality = 75, Smoothing = 0