Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (45406)	5/19/2004 8:28:35 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793927

NYT editors must have been napping when that article passed by them. Editors don't have an control over columnists, but I take your point nonetheless. It was startling. I'm surprised at Safire. Something pushed his buttons, buttons I didn't know he had. He's always so cool and controlled.

To: unclewest who wrote (45406)	5/19/2004 8:41:49 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793927

NYTimes part of communist conspiracy or now its the islamic conspiracy. I read the paper every day. I see the bias on the editorial page. Occasionally there is a dumb (biased) news story or a particular news event is overplayed, but all and all its still the nation's best paper. Brooks and Safire are regulars as are Krugman and Dowd. Krugman is a joke. He keeps rewriting the same article over and over again. But all and all its a representative op-ed page. Many republicans read the paper as well but i guess you are not interested in getting the votes of folks who have differences with the way the war has been handled. Mike