SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (133522)5/19/2004 9:19:54 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Was it worth spending over $180 Billion tax dollars and sacrificing OVER 700 U.S. LIVES to go over and find one old Iraqi warhead with a little sarin in it...? Look at how this war was conducted...The prison scandal is outrageous -- the Geneva convention protocols were thrown out the window...Look how all our key allies have been antagonized...The U.S. credibility is at an all time low around the world. Who will take responsibility for this...? Mr. Bush and his team don't ever like to admit mistakes.



To: Bill who wrote (133522)5/20/2004 8:14:18 PM
From: E  Respond to of 281500
 
Woo, that was a close call!



To: Bill who wrote (133522)5/20/2004 10:45:28 PM
From: h0db  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Before the war, the CIA said that Iraq overcounted the number of Sarin-filled artillery shells used during the Iran-Iraq by 6,000. This was the number commonly thrown around during the Bush drive to war, and the basis for the "imminent threat" argument that supposedly required war "right now."

Only 5,999 more to find.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News