SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (24316)5/21/2004 7:07:08 AM
From: WaynersRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
The federal government pays about $300.00 billion in salary and benefits to over 4 million government workers. That works out to an average salary, with benefits, of around $66,000 a year per federal employee.

Compare that to the private sector's average salary of about $43,000 per year, with benefits. Nationwide, municipal government workers average about $56,000 per year, with benefits. All state workers average about the same, $56,000 a year, including benefits.

Private sector workers make about $23,000 less, annually, than federal workers, municipal and state workers are around $10,000 a year behind.

270 billion is a lot of money to pay for people who Administer programs and DONT ACTUALLY PERFORM ANY SERVICES THEMSELVES. They just act as a middleman/broker by collecting taxes and then taking a large cut of the money and funnelling the money to states or contractors who actually perform the real work and provide the service such as teaching in a classroom, performing medical treament, filling prescriptions etc. The Federal Govt is much like the United Way. The United way takes most of the charity money to pay for its own outlandish expanses and then forwards a fraction of the money for actualy charity work.



To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (24316)5/21/2004 7:17:28 AM
From: WaynersRespond to of 81568
 
Just as much revenue, 1800 billion was collected in 2002 as under Clinton in 1998 and there were no tax cuts in 1998. Revenue dipped in 2000 BEFORE any tax cuts were ever passed. How is this possible? Easy, slowing economy.