SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (178055)5/21/2004 11:23:37 AM
From: rkral  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
GVTucker, re "In refusing to start expensing options, I noticed that Andy Bryant stated that fewer employees would receive options if they were expensed. What an absolute crock. "

Andy Bryant should have said Intel didn't wish to put its EPS in an unfavorable light .. when compared to other companies that don't expense .. and that it would expense when the FASB requires all companies to expense.

That would have been more credible, but Craig Barrett wouldn't have liked that response. :-)

JMO, Ron

P.S. I missed that Bryant refusal. Do you have a link?



To: GVTucker who wrote (178055)5/26/2004 3:51:26 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV, Steve Jobs received $75 million dollars for driving the stock down from $50 to $25 in four years.

Yes, that's right, downward.

It creates a rather nasty stigma on what was an otherwise respectable CEO.

Time for Congressional reform.

But the $75 million dollars were not option gains, according to Mercury News.

In fact, if these were options, he'd receive $0 dollars because there was no gain.

He got paid $75M for having a pulse.

Regards,
Amy J


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News