Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (46174)	5/21/2004 9:26:09 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793975

Josh Marshall has an interesting reading of the Chalabi affair in which he argues the timing points to "tectonic" shifts of power within the Bush administration. (May 21, 2004 -- 07:31 PM EDT) From a trickle to a torrent ... On Friday, Stahl reported that senior intelligence officials stress the information Ahmad Chalibi is alleged to have passed on to Iran is of such a seriously sensitive nature, the result of full disclosure could be highly damaging to U.S. security. The information involves secrets that were held by only a handful of very senior U.S. officials, says Stahl. Meanwhile, Stahl reports that "grave concerns" about the true nature of Chalabi's relationship with Iran started after the U.S. obtained "undeniable intelligence" that Chalabi met with a senior Iranian intelligence, a "nefarious figure from the dark side of the regime - an individual with a direct hand in covert operations directed against the United States." Chalabi never reported this meeting to his friends and sponsors in the U.S. government, says Stahl. In truth, and not to defend Chalabi, but I think we need to wait and watch these reports closely. Much of the charges we're seeing here have been out there for some time, though not with quite the specifics or with such gravity. Chalabi's ties with Iran have been known (and winked at) for years; claims that he was sharing sensitive US info with them have been out there for at least a few months. It's not that the claims are false. In fact, I quite suspect the opposite. But what we're seeing here is less the result of new revelations than the outward signs of deep tectonic shifts within the US government -- the discrediting of some factions and agencies, the attempts of others to reposition themselves in a moment of acute crisis and get ahead of the storm, and the freeing up of others to assert themselves for the first time in years. It's probably too dramatic to compare this to the bubbles, choppy water and occasional scraps churned up by a Piranha feeding. But the struggles that are giving rise to all these leaks and tergiversations of the state are the real story -- one that it is difficult to see directly, but possible to glimpse in what we can infer from its effects and repercussions. -- Josh Marshall

To: Dayuhan who wrote (46174)	5/21/2004 9:46:43 PM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 793975

I tend to agree with the guy who attributed Chalabi's changing fortunes to shifting allegiances within the administration. The counter spin is that we're only pretending to jettison him in order to boost his standing with the Iraqi people, but I disbelieve that. I have seen nothing to suggest that the Iraqi people want anything to do with Chalabi, he was the favorite of Cheney-Wolfowitz-Woolsey-Perle, maybe because he promised that Iraq would develop close ties to Israel, maybe because he promised that Iraq would develop closer ties to the US, maybe because he was seen as a conduit to moderate Iranians. Maybe all of the above.