Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MrLucky who wrote (24580)	5/22/2004 9:39:22 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Why? It seems all Kerry has to do is let Bush destroy himself as results of his own policies come back to bring him down. He doesn't even need to spend any money, just let Bush spend all of his trying to buy some traction. Bush is the weakest incumbent I've seen since Jimmy Carter. Even some of the more sensible Republicans are starting to edge away from the loser. Next time you see the monkey on TV, look closely at his eyes - you'll see fear there. Fear of following Poppy into the dustbin of failed Presidencies. For someone with the "daddy" issues Bush has, that's got to be the abyss.

To: MrLucky who wrote (24580)	5/22/2004 11:35:08 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Oh right. Like you're a Kerry or Nader supporter. As if. Diehard Bushies who pretend to be disaffected democrats are immediately busted on this thread. We do remember your last 100 anti-Kerry pro-Bush posts. Kerry is one of the smartest political strategists around. He will pick his VP when it suits him. He will also take his time studying each candidate. Why make rushed decisions like Bush always does? Kerry's views are as clear as they CAN be nine months before he'd have to take power in an ever-changing Iraqi and budgetary world. Will Iraq be better or worse? Will there be another 9-11? Will Bush deficits be 1.5 trillion or 2.5 trillion? We don't yet know.

To: MrLucky who wrote (24580)	5/22/2004 12:00:37 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Don, Bush reminds me of a UPS delivery man. Always in a rush to do things. He declared Mission Accomplished before it was time. He started the Iraqi war before the weapons inspectors finished their job. He started his campaign for President in Marc, the earliest start of a re election campaign in history. I don't think Kerry has to compete with Bush on this. He needs to be cool, analytical and decisive. What is the hurry for a VP? After all, isn't the VP who gets up every morning, opens the bedroom window the first this in the morning and if it is sunny decides to golf after checking on how the President's health is that day. Off course in Bush's case it is "exactly the opposite" and hence it is important for the people to know who Bush's VP is not Kerry? Kerry does not have to rely on his VP. If he was called to testify in front of the 9/11 commission, he would go in to testify all by himself, not with his VP?