SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MrLucky who wrote (24618)5/22/2004 12:37:28 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
have you considered moving on to the Bush thread?
Clinton-phobia isn't going to play with this mess Bush has created. Hillary could win against Bush now, or for that matter the village idiot could take Bush in 04.

If Clinton was able to run again for another term I'm sure he could easily win against Bush. Teddy Kennedy could win against Bush.



To: MrLucky who wrote (24618)5/22/2004 12:45:08 PM
From: ChinuSFORead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Iraq may be Bush's end
May 20, 2004

For the first time, Bush must face the real possibility that he will leave office soon - as a failure, writes Gregory Hywood.

In his new book, Plan of Attack, the famous American journalist Bob Woodward relates how on August 5, 2002, US Secretary of State Colin Powell advised George Bush that if he invaded Iraq the war would dominate his presidency.

Woodward writes that Powell told the President: "You are going to be the proud owner of 25 million people. You will own all their hopes, aspirations and problems. You'll own it all.

"It's going to suck the oxygen out of everything," Powell continued. And so as not to sidestep the politics of it, he added: "This will become the first term."

The clear implication was: did the President want to be defined this way? Did he want to run for re-election on an Iraq war?

Later, in an interview for the book, Woodward asked Bush about that conversation with Powell. Bush's reply was mostly about the issues of freedom and security, but he conceded that his Secretary of State was talking of the practical difficulties associated with Iraqi reconstruction.

<more> theage.com.au



To: MrLucky who wrote (24618)5/22/2004 2:22:59 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
You're out of your mind. Kerry is firmly in charge of the party now, not Clinton. You're having weird fantasies. Rightwingers like to spread these wild stories about Hillary because they have no other issues to run on, but they're all BS.