SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (134075)5/23/2004 2:19:49 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
King Abdullah said it was nerve gas, I was quoting him. If it turned out not to be, okay, I was wrong and so was he. If that report is right, it also contradicts earlier reports which said that the trucks came over the border loaded for action.



To: Ilaine who wrote (134075)5/24/2004 10:00:58 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I am starting to wonder whether you are deliberately twisting this to suit your rhetorical purpose.

This is really something.

The "only agricultural chemicals" line makes me wonder what rhetorical purpose you might have.

Nowhere have you nor I seen what kind of chemicals were involved, their relative concentration, and how they react in the presence of other agents.

For this reason, the fact that no one knows the nature of these chemicals, not in these forums, anyway, I have been silent on the issue, though I have read with increasing amusement your exchange with a farmer who is familiar on a first-hand basis with how deadly some of these chemicals in concentrated form can be.

Despite this utter and complete lack of knowledge about the nature of the chemicals, we do know that they were planned for a substantial attack in Amman. That fact seems to be fairly well-established, though I wouldn't bet my retirement fund on it.