To: Poet who wrote (13481 ) 5/24/2004 9:34:07 AM From: lorne Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610 Poet. You said...." But I'm unclear about what you mean here: ......You and others should not be using islam terrorism as a political tool to further your own causes...... Would you explain? "..... Yes of course, it was this post of yours that appears to be political in nature to me and your apparent support for the notion that we are playing into bin lades hands. --------------------------------------- John, What a thorough, and correct, IMO, analysis of the methods and goals of al Qaeda. This paragraph in particular, in which you outlined how perfectly the American response fit like a hand in a glove, is of particular importance: If bin Laden could have chosen one response, it might have been that we invade Iraq. First, it was a secular Arab government, as much his enemy as ours. Second it was a stabilized Arab populace with almost no terrorist presence. Third it could be used as proof of what he has been saying all along; that beyond the support of the illegitimate monarchies, the Christian US has started a crusade against the Arab Muslims. Fourth, it would destabilize and weaken other governments throughout the Arab ME. With our irrational and non-proportional response, we gave him exactly what he wanted. Iraq is a huge win for Al Qaeda. Why the right can't see this mystifies me. Despite their claim of being "more patriotic than thou", their chest-beating and headlong rush to do precisely what al Qaeda wants is far more dangerous to the US's reputation, and ultimately to our safety as a nation, than the left's wish that there be a rapid end of the grisly business we've gotten into in Iraq. Here's to your post not falling on deaf ears. Message 20156058