Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bluegreen who wrote (16881)	5/26/2004 9:29:34 AM
From: Robert S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17367

In the past on this message board, when those who were optimistic about Xoma's pharmaceutical candidates greatly outnumbered those who weren't, you took the messages here very seriously. Now that the zealot's ranks have been greatly reduced, you resort to replying in juvenile fashion because you, standing alone, cannot respond in a logical and thoughtful manner.

To: Bluegreen who wrote (16881)	5/26/2004 9:49:01 AM
From: Edscharp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17367

Bluegreen, "I told Bluegreen that it doesn't matter that the little guy lost his money because Ed is always on the side of RIGHT." I never noticed before, but do you always refer to yourself in the third person? You may wish to seek some sort of help for this, either grammaticaly or personal. You be the judge of course. You don't handle the use of sarcasm very well and if you analyze your own post a bit you will see that you are taking issue with me for being too altruistic. Wow, what a crime! Nonetheless, I assure you, you needn't worry about me. I understand completely that my impact on other readers will be minimal. Frankly, I can't understand why you are so het-up about my posts. According to you all posts are fiction anyway. Maybe you meant 'friction'. lol. Could it be because I said something negative about RK? Best Regards, Ed