Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (47038)	5/26/2004 4:25:19 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793921

John conveniently narrows Marxist studies to exclude gender feminism, and now will poo poo any source that demonstrates it. John and I never get anywhere. We just poke each other with sharp sticks. We have been doing this for so long that we can mail it in. I enjoy putting the needle in.

To: D. Long who wrote (47038)	5/26/2004 8:19:03 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793921

You know you aren't going to get anywhere with this one, Bill. Are you sure this isn't just another one of those semantic arguments? Looks to me like it could well be--a question of using the demonizing label, Marxist, rather than an issue of a power leveling technique. The substantive issue may also present a conflict, but it seems to me that the discussion to date has been about the label.

To: D. Long who wrote (47038)	5/26/2004 10:51:26 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793921

"Gender feminism"? How does that differ from plain vanilla feminism?

To: D. Long who wrote (47038)	5/26/2004 3:28:05 PM
From: JohnM	Respond to of 793921

John conveniently narrows Marxist studies to exclude gender feminism, and now will poo poo any source that demonstrates it. I gather you plan to make a case that Marxism includes "gender feminism" whatever that is. Be my guest. There is, incidentally, an argument for that, in fact more than one, but each stretches the usual understandings of each well beyond any recognizable form. Lind either didn't know them or didn't make them because he was in such a hurry to use unacceptable smear tactics.