SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (47319)5/26/2004 9:42:26 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
In order to get one old shell with a little Sarin in it was it worth sacrificing over 4000 soldiers to injuries and death...? In order to get one old shell with a little Sarin it was it worth spending over $150 Billion U.S. tax dollars...? In order to get one old shell with a little Sarin in it was it worth sacrificing tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi lives...? Saddam was NOT an imminent threat...that fact is clear...we had him contained BUT the NeoCON fanatics (lead by Cheney) were determined to have a war...We have stirred up a hornets nest and fueled more terrorism...Mr. Bush is responsible for authorizing the war that caused this situation -- he clearly FAILED to do his homework.



To: Wayners who wrote (47319)5/26/2004 9:49:04 AM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 89467
 
right, shell could be from 1980 Iran War
just like the 100's of body parts seen last year (april)

did they have a date tag on that Sarin shell ?
did it say "destined for Kurdistan" ?

if that is your justification for war, utterly pathetic
maybe the North should attack Richmond again?
we found some bullets in Gettysburg

/ jim