SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (25718)5/26/2004 1:18:25 PM
From: American SpiritRespond to of 81568
 
Under oath, Clarke said the order same from either the White House Chief Of Staff or State. If he's changing his story now, he lied one time or the other. Why do you always leave that part of his testimony out of your attempts to cover up this issue for the Bushies? We all saw him state that UNDER OATH before the commission. If he lied, he's guilty of perjury and there should be a further investigation.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (25718)5/26/2004 1:27:05 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
On Clarke and Saudis, here is the part you always leave out.

ROEMER: We don't know how many people were on a plane that flew out of this country. Who gave the final approval, then, to say yes, you're clear to go, it's all right with the United States government to go to Saudi Arabia?

CLARKE: I was making or coordinating a lot of decisions on 9/11 and the days immediately after. And I would love to be able to tell you who did it, who brought this proposal to me, but I don't know. Since you pressed me, the two possibilities that are most likely are either the Department of State, or the White House Chief of Staff's Office.

* And now he's changing his story after saying this under oath? Something's very fishy, huh?