Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (47378)	5/26/2004 3:05:44 PM
From: T L Comiskey	Respond to of 89467

Re killing 4,000,000.. I would subsidize Tobacco and make sure the Nascar Set was lured into burning their ropes at both ends <ng> Meanwhile.. 'On Death and Taxes' Court Backs Oregon's Assisted Suicide Law By DAVID KRAVETS, Associated Press Writer SAN FRANCISCO - A federal appeals court ordered the Bush administration not to meddle with a state's assisted suicide law, ruling Wednesday that doctors in Oregon may prescribe lethal doses of medication to terminally ill patients. Ruling on the nation's only law that allows doctors to assist in hastening the death of a patient, the court said U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft (news - web sites) cannot sanction or hold Oregon doctors criminally liable for prescribing overdoses, as the state's voter-approved Death With Dignity Act allows. "The attorney general's unilateral attempt to regulate general medical practices historically entrusted to state lawmakers interferes with the democratic debate about physician assisted suicide," wrote Judge Richard Tallman in the 2-1 opinion by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites). He said Ashcroft's action "far exceeds the scope of his authority under federal law." The Justice Department (news - web sites) had concluded that suicide is not a "legitimate medical purpose," but Oregon maintained it had the power to declare for itself what types of medical procedures are allowed. The case dates from April 2002, when a judge in Portland, Ore., blocked the Justice Department from threatening to punish doctors. In a sharp rebuke to Ashcroft, U.S. District Judge Robert Jones ruled that the Controlled Substances Act — the federal law declaring what drugs doctors may prescribe — does not give the federal government the power to say what is a legitimate medical practice. In a dissent Wednesday, 9th Circuit Judge J. Clifford Wallace said the courts should give "substantial deference" to the attorney general's findings in the absence of a clear congressional policy. "Certainly, Congress is free to enact legislation limiting or counteracting the Ashcroft directive's effects," Wallace said. Oregon voters approved the Death With Dignity Act in 1994 and overwhelmingly affirmed it three years later when it was returned to the ballot following a failed legal challenge that stalled its implementation. The law allows terminally ill patients with less than six months to live to request a lethal dose of drugs. Two doctors must confirm the diagnosis and determine the patient to be mentally competent to make the request. In a 1996 Washington state case, the 9th Circuit ruled that assisted suicide was permitted because there was a constitutional right to die. That decision meant Washington state could not prosecute doctors who aided their patients' deaths. But the following year, the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) reversed, saying states could prosecute doctors who assist in suicides — a move some interpreted as signaling that the justices were freeing the states to decide for themselves whether assisted suicide should be allowed. Since 1998, at least 171 people have used the law to end their lives, according to Oregon state records. Most suffered from cancer. Ashcroft's directive, which reversed a 1998 opinion by former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno (news - web sites), also banned any lethal prescriptions on grounds they did not qualify as medication under the federal Controlled Substances Act. Oregon argued that regulating and licensing doctors generally has been the sole responsibility of the states, which license doctors to practice medicine. Oregon also said that Congress intended only to prevent illegal drug trafficking by doctors under the Controlled Substances Act, and that it left decisions about medical practice up to the states.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (47378)	5/26/2004 3:10:39 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

"yeah, if it makes you think for a second about reality." lol...That coming from a guy who preaches that the Soviet Union never collapsed, they just changed their vision. However, it is not hard for me to think about what extremists are like. I view their comments on this thread and on the Bush thread. In addition, I personally know many Arabs who talk like extremists. It is not hard for me to imagine at all. "Do you have a nuke in your garage?" No. And like I said, I don't think there will be one hit by one person or one group. I think the hit will be at many locations, accross the US and Europe, over a relatively short period of time and committed by a large number of disconnected groups and individuals with a common goal. I doubt they can accomplish the 4m goal or even come close... but I don't doubt they will try, and that the results will be horrible. but keep right on chortling ... if it helps you get through the day. Maybe there will be enough people who do care and stand up to the issue that people like you can continue your sillyness, maybe not.