Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (52253)	5/27/2004 11:16:27 AM
From: bob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57110

**Pop Poll***** It was just released that DNA evidence suggests that Kobe Bryant's accuser had sex with another man within hours of having sexual contact with Two part question: 1. If True, do you believe that Kobe is Not Guilty or Guilty? 2. Has your opinion changed because of this evidence? (yes/no) Two part question: 1. If True, do you believe that Kobe is Not Guilty or Guilty? 2. Has your opinion changed because of this evidence? (yes/no) ---------------------------------------------------------- Not Guilty - Yes - Jxm Not Guilty - No - bob ----------------------------------------------------------

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (52253)	5/27/2004 11:56:28 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

**Pop Poll*** It was just released that DNA evidence suggests that Kobe Bryant's accuser had sex with another man within hours of having sexual contact with Two part question: 1. If True, do you believe that Kobe is Not Guilty or Guilty? 2. Has your opinion changed because of this evidence? (yes/no) ---------------------------------------------------------- Not Guilty - Yes - JXM ******** can't weigh on this one....just because there was other DNA evidence doesn't mean she couldn't have been raped...it would depend on when the other man's dna got there...it the release just says hours with having sexual contact... before or after is highly critical, imo