SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sjemmeri who wrote (19242)5/27/2004 5:55:51 PM
From: Brendan W  Respond to of 78568
 
I would track them as is AND start a new portfolio. It seems like the portfolios draw enough interest to do it more than once a calendar year. If you allow revisions, you compromise the ability to track the performance of the original portfolio.

FWIW, I would rather have the "double" portfolio labeled something else ("major winner", or "50% gainer"). I can't get my mind around value stocks that I expect to double within a year. I couldn't think of any in January and can't now either. This may be unique to me because it usually takes more than a year for my investments to double.



To: sjemmeri who wrote (19242)6/1/2004 1:49:53 PM
From: sjemmeri  Respond to of 78568
 
Washington Post article on Sunday on Al Frank Fund/Prudent Speculator Newsletter (now run by John Buckingham) mentions current/recent picks including: Microsoft, Traffix, Keynote Systems, Orbit International, Beazer Homes, and D.R. Horton.

steve



To: sjemmeri who wrote (19242)6/17/2004 11:02:29 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78568
 
I would vote on keeping portfolios as is and adding a new one at the end of the year. I.e. I don't think there is enough interest/new stuff to add new portfolios every half year.

Jurgis