Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (134664)	5/27/2004 10:04:47 PM
From: dumbmoney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

So if Saddam supported terrorists, if guys on his payroll helped plan 9/11 (as todays WSJ reported), if he bought a Paki nuke, that would have been "success" to you? Because all these things were true already, or likely to become true in the near future. I suppose it means nothing to you that so many lies of the pro-war gang have already been exposed. (Saddam has WMD! We know where the WMD are! We found the WMD!). You can always make up fresh lies, and in crackpot fashion, assert that they must be regarded as true unless they can be disproved.