SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: abstract who wrote (2833)5/28/2004 8:40:18 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
If that's the best you can do, please do not make any
further "Absolutist words and phrases terms" regarding,

"Republicans have Bushwacked common decency and American
values for their own benefit."


The same goes for your, "Absolutist words and phrases
terms" about me that have ZERO basis in fact or reality,
like this,

"You can't see it because you are part of the problem.
You always sided against the liberals and for the conservatives."


The thread header is clear. "Please try to stick to
facts & reality (I.E. facts & reality that are widely
accepted & easily supported - not because you or your
ideological peers say so)."


I asked you to support these baseless assertions with
links to credible evidence several times now. You have
simply ignored my request every time & instead, you spout
additional baseless assertions in your reply.

This thread is about exposing, "perceptions that defy
reality even as time & events unfold in stark contrast to
these stated POV's."
It is not here for you to post what
you please in complete disregard for the standards
established for this thread. It is not about debating your
personal opinions, baseless assertions & misperceptions of
reality in endless circles as you seem to want to do. If
you can't or won't provide credible evidence to support
your POV when challenged, that POV, assertion, etc., is
then out of bounds on this thread.

It's that simple.



To: abstract who wrote (2833)5/28/2004 8:53:29 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (7) | Respond to of 35834
 
"Absolutist words and phrases terms (distortion, lies,
deceit, baseless assertions, skewed, inflexible) strike me
as more indicative of posturing than anything
substantive."


The point you absolutely fail to recognize is that when I
use any of those words, I can & will support them with
facts & reality (I.E. facts & reality that are widely
accepted & easily supported).

You, on the other hand, will make any number of absolute
assertions & opinion as if it were fact, but you rarely,
if ever back it up with credible evidence when challenged.
All you do is reply with more personal opinion stated as
fact, frequently after I have provided you with evidence
to completely debunk your faulty POV.

And somehow you see no real difference between you & I. In
fact, you have just confidently claimed that when I make
assertions, to you they are "more indicative of
posturing than anything substantive."


"You post a lot and include myriad links. I will very
rarely have the time to read them all. I am bound to
misconstrue a quality of yours periodically. Please look
at this as an oversight as opposed to an attack on your
character."


Read the thread header. Please stick to the guidelines. We
won't have any more "oversights" if you do.