SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/28/2004 10:46:13 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
May payrolls will set tone for June markets
Friday, May 28, 2004 11:14:56 PM

WASHINGTON (AFX) -- The May U.S. payrolls report could be the catalyst that knocks U.S. investors off the fence

U.S. financial markets have been treading water for a month, waiting for something or someone to force a move one way or the other. Stocks, bonds, currencies and even commodities have gyrated over the past 30 days, but are now back close to levels seen in late April. The mostly-healthy-but-not-overpowering economic data have been offset by higher energy prices and worries about terrorism. Worries about inflation have waxed and waned, along with expectations about how fast the Federal Open Market Committee will raise interest rates

The May nonfarm payrolls report on Friday could settle at least some of the questions about the Fed and the economy, opening the way for a breakout in financial markets one way or the other

Some of the markets' other troubles could be addressed at the OPEC meeting on Thursday. Following growth of 337,000 in March and 288,000 in April, nonfarm payrolls are expected to rise about 220,000 in May, according to a survey of 27 economists conducted by CBS MarketWatch. The forecasts ranged from 135,000 to 300,000.
[following those lies, who the F knows what the next lie will be - mish]

The jobs figures will be released Friday at 8:30 a.m. Eastern. Economists expect the jobless rate to remain at 5.6 percent and expect average hourly wages to grow 0.2 percent in April, or 2 percent year-over-year

'Measured' Fed The payroll figures could loom large in the Federal Reserve's calculations about when to raise interest rates and how aggressively it should move. The Fed has promised a "measured" response to stronger growth and higher inflation, but has not explained exactly what "measured" means

If the economy continues to expand slightly above trend with a modest acceleration in inflation, economists and market participants would expect quarter-point rate hikes at three or four of the five remaining FOMC meetings this year, leaving the federal funds rate at 1.75 or 2 percent. It would take a strong reading of more than 250,000 "or a sharp jump in wages, to be a damper for financial markets," said Avery Shenfeld, economist for CIBC World Markets. A strong reading on either payroll growth or wages could spark renewed calls for a stronger response from the Fed, perhaps half-point increases that would bring the fed funds rate rapidly toward a neutral level around 3 percent. On the other hand, a weak payrolls reading could ignite a rally in the bond market if it looks like the Fed will be forced into a slower path

"Given that expectations are heavily skewed toward a 25 basis point tightening move on June 30, it will take a weak report (say 125,000 or less payroll growth) to cause markets to begin to reassess this scenario," said Joshua Shapiro, chief economist for MFR

Other aspects of the payroll report will bear watching. Wage growth as reported by the Labor Department's establishment survey has been weak, keeping a lid on inflationary pressures. But recent revisions to data from state employment offices not yet incorporated in the payroll survey show stronger wage growth. Perhaps wages or job growth are not so weak after all, a threat to the Fed's theory about a large output gap

"A significant upward revision to payrolls" seems likely, said Maury Harris, chief U.S. economist for UBS. Harris believes unit labor costs (and therefore inflationary pressures) are likely higher than we now believe

Others disagree. "Our sense is that the recovery in employment is too recent to have had much of an impact on worker wage demands as there remains a significant amount of slack in the system," said Joe Abate, an economist for Lehman Bros

Lehman figures the economy would need to create 1.9 million jobs by the end of the year to drive the unemployment rate back down to 5 percent, if work-force participation rates remain at cyclical lows of 65.9 percent

However, it's likely that better hiring conditions would lure many people back into the labor force, pushing the participation rate back toward 2000's all-time high of 67.3 percent. If so, then any inflationary pressures from wage demands would take even longer to surface. Economists are watching the participation rate nearly as closely as they are the unemployment rate. Other data As always, the Institute for Supply Management index will get a close reading on Tuesday. This diffusion index of sentiment among manufacturing executives is considered one of the most reliable leading indicators of economic activity. The data are due at 10 a.m. Tuesday. The ISM has been above 60 percent for six straight months, a feat not seen for 20 years. Economists expect a seventh month in May, with a reading of 61.6 percent

The consensus may be lower than the "whisper" numbers in the markets, following the surprising leap in the similar Chicago purchasing managers index to a 16-year high of 68.0 percent in May

"The report should confirm that strong domestic demand, lean inventories, and solid export growth have factory activity running at full-throttle," said Rick MacDonald, an economist for Action Economics. The week's other data will get little notice in the markets

Auto sales are expected to have accelerated to an annual pace of 13.4 million in May. Retail chains will also report on their May same-store sales, with 5 percent year-on-year growth expected. Factory orders likely dropped 1.3 percent in April. Productivity in the first quarter could be revised to 3.7 percent from 3.5 percent. Construction spending probably increased 0.4 percent in April. This story was supplied by CBSMarketWatch. For further information see www.cbsmarketwatch.com

fxstreet.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/29/2004 12:01:46 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
U.S. signs Central American trade pact -
Friday, May 28, 2004 7:57:00 PM

WASHINGTON (AFX) -- The United States signed a historic trade deal with five Central American nations on Friday, but the pact is unlikely to be approved by Congress before the November presidential election

"Today is just the beginning of the most critical chapter for CAFTA. In both the United States and Central America, we must now turn our attention to winning approval of the agreement from our respective legislatures," U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick said

The Bush administration faces an uphill battle in Congress, as a number of Democrats on Capitol Hill say the provisions do not sufficiently protect U.S. workers from what they say is unfair competition from the lower paid workers of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua

The Central American Free Trade Agreement, known as CAFTA, would essentially extend southward the North American Free Trade Agreement

In March, the Dominican Republic concluded negotiations to join CAFTA, but the island nation could not participate in Friday's signing because the White House must give Congress 90 days to review any deals before they can be signed and not enough time has elapsed

CAFTA would immediately eliminate tariffs on more than 80 percent of U.S. exports of consumer and industrial products, phasing out the rest over 10 years. Tariffs would be eliminated on 50 percent of farm goods, and tariffs on some additional farm goods, except sugar, would be eliminated over time

President Bush hopes the free-trade zone would serve as a building block for the Free Trade Area of the Americas that would ultimately include all of North and South America, except Cuba

Opposition on Capitol Hill includes Democratic challenger John Kerry, who said he would renegotiate the pact if he wins the White House on Nov. 2

"The free-trade agreement that was signed today marks a disappointing and unnecessary step backwards in our nation's efforts to ensure that opening markets results in higher living standards on all sides and not a race to the bottom on worker rights and environmental protection," the Massachusetts senator said in a written statement

Zoellick understands the deal is not likely to be approved by Congress before the election, but said Thursday that he hopes the Congress could hold a special "lame-duck" session in late November or early December to get the pact approved before year's end

Business groups hailed the signing, and said CAFTA should not be viewed by Congress in isolation

"CAFTA is an important building block in our overall trade strategy to open markets for U.S. companies and workers through a network of free trade agreements in the WTO -- a strategy that promotes economic growth in the U.S," said John Castellani, president of the Business Roundtable, a group of CEOs of major U.S. firms

fxstreet.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/29/2004 10:54:02 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 116555
 
CR, I am pretty certain Iraq, Venezuela, Indonesia and Russia are not pumping at capacity. Not for lack of trying, but they have internal problems reducing production. If those should drop, supply would increase. However, I think it is more likely for Saudi Arabia, Lybia, the UAE, Mexico, etc. to develop their own internal problems before the other guys solve theirs.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/29/2004 10:52:38 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Splotto on Housing...

I am not involved in the sales portion of our business, so this news is about a month late to me.

It seems that recently many of our homes have been selling at such high prices that they are failing to appraise high enough to secure a mortgage. Many times this might be due to the lack of adequate 'comps' in the area (were we are building the first really high end units). However, there is no doubt that it is also because the prices paid are very high.

This is alarming because when was the last time you heard of an appraiser that worked for mortgage brokers NOT reporting that the NEW house was worth the price? It almost never happens. How high must these prices be?

Well, our sales divisions solution seems to be taking back very small paper on the deal in order the get them the mortgage. It's not a real threat to us since it's short term and the same rate as the mortgage (and fixed). It is also less then the profit from the sale (or so they are reporting). However, even with the risk, the extra money is all gravy (since we wouldn't be able to sell the house to others for the same price). Or at least that is their rationale.

Therein lays the real horror of this story. Our sales divisions rational is that we issue this paper because it's all icing on the cake since we would have to sell the house for the appraised price since no buyer would get approved. Do you see the implication of that ingrained mindset?

There are 2 possible scenarios:

1. There are no buyers with down payments out there. If you have a large down payment, you could afford the house price over the appraisal because you are not borrowing anywhere near the full amount. These buyers are BORROWING more then the value of the house and there are NO other buyers out there bringing cash to the transaction; or,

2. The people who are cashing in on the increase in value of their existing homes are SO OVERPAYING of the new home that even with their down payment they are still short on value.

Seacrest out!
Splotto



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/29/2004 10:54:09 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Saudis storm besieged compound
Gunmen kill at least 11 in attack on oil industry complexes
cnn.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/29/2004 11:05:25 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Bad gas
cnn.com

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (AP) -- Just before the heavy-driving Memorial Day weekend, more than 500 Shell and Texaco stations in the South have stopped selling gasoline because of high sulfur levels that can ruin vehicle fuel gauges and make an empty tank appear full.

The damage done by the bad gasoline could cause some drivers to run out of gas unexpectedly. Also, car owners may have to replace their fuel gauges -- a repair job that can easily cost $400 to $600.

The tainted gasoline originated at the Motiva Enterprises refinery in Norco, Louisiana, according to Shell Oil Co. Motiva is the refining arm of Shell in the East and South. Motiva supplied the gasoline to both Shell and Texaco.

The refinery said it is investigating how the high sulfur levels occurred. Sulfur is naturally present in crude oil; some of it is supposed to be removed during refining.

As of Friday, 119 Shell and Texaco stations were closed in the New Orleans area, and 400 were not selling fuel in Florida, said Shell spokeswoman Helen Bow.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/29/2004 11:13:38 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
M3 and other things.
Crash coming?
Interesting article here.

safehaven.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/30/2004 12:09:28 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
The fall of the House of Saud

foi.missouri.edu



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/30/2004 12:17:43 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Asia Bust?
Message 20177664



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/30/2004 12:21:25 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
question about saudi capacity
Message 20178587



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (7253)5/30/2004 12:53:35 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
The Dow Report
Advancing vs declining
financialsense.com