SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Square_Dealings who wrote (14709)5/30/2004 1:52:44 AM
From: Wade  Respond to of 110194
 
He is right. Look at the MACD in the weekly chart:

stockcharts.com[w,a]waclyyay[pb10!b40][vc60][iUb14!La12,26,9]&pref=G



To: Square_Dealings who wrote (14709)5/30/2004 10:30:32 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
Wow, this Safehaven piece should be read in it's entirety by everyone. I'm leaning towards a different interpretation of what this monster money supply growth is signaling though. I don't really think it's the Fed injecting fresh liquidity into the system , as they've already done this ad nauseum. What's happening is the all this previous liquidity is now being mobilized in panic mode. From German inflation essay I posted earlier:

Prices were in fact rising much faster than the rate at which money was being printed. Therefore, reasoned the officials, the price inflation could hardly be blamed on the government. Actually, as we shall see, the ebb and flow of confidence can play a big role in the short-term trend of prices. Confidence in the mark had weakened. At the same time, and as a consequence, billions of hoarded marks came out of hiding and entered the marketplace. The accumulated fuel was burning.

In otherwords we are entering the crack up boom phase of this Train Wreck debacle, where players quickly lose confidence in the currency and seek ways to get rid of it. It's also very important to realize that an enormous hoard of USDs are held abroad by individual foreigners, who may be less susceptible to Ministry of Propanganda balming techniques. Here's how this was described in the German inflation in the early 20's:
Message 20166261

To compound the evil, the bank failed to raise its interest rate sufficiently. Businessmen found it very profitable to borrow money from the bank and buy up goods, shares and companies. Their debt was wiped out within weeks by the rapid inflation, and the businessman remained holding the valuable assets he had bought. The net result was a huge "private inflation" caused by the rapid expansion of credit. Even foreign exchange was bought with borrowed money, so that the Reichsbank actually financed speculation against its own currency. Yet the bank refused to raise interest rates, arguing that this would only add to the cost of business and thus would increase inflation.

The main force which gave inflation its momentum was the steady decrease in the true value of money in circulation. This has been observed in all past rapid inflations and it is vital to understand it if inflation is to be coped with. During the war, as we saw, the price inflation lagged behind the rate at which money was issued. But now, as people lost confidence, prices began jumping much faster than the government could generate new money. Thus the total circulating currency fell drastically when measured in terms of its true value. One economist stated that, "In proportion to the need, less money circulates in Germany now than before the war.
This statement may cause surprise but it is correct. The circulation is now 15-20 times that of pre-war days, whilst prices have risen 40-50 times." In fact, the total currency when calculated in gold value fell from 7428 million marks in January 1920 to a mere 168 million by July 1923.

Despite the proliferating billions of trillions of marks, the average citizen found it harder and harder to get enough money for necessities. Banks, short of money, could not honor checks. Businessmen were strapped for money to buy materials and meet payrolls. The government faced the same problem. It appeared that there was not too much money around, but rather much too little. The clamor for more money grew on all sides. It seemed that any halt to the printing presses would bring business to a standstill and throw millions of workers out on the street. The government itself would be unable to carry on. Riding a tiger, it dared not dismount. On October 25, 1923, the Reichsbank noted that it had that day printed 120,000 trillion marks. Unfortunately, the day's demand had been for one million trillion. However, it announced that it was expanding production and the daily issue would soon be 500,000 trillion!

Once people lose confidence in a currency, they try to get rid of it. As Lord Keynes pointed out, this makes circulation speed up enormously, and hence prices rise faster than the government can print new money. Marshall, studying this process, concluded that, "The total value of an ' inconvertible paper currency cannot be increased by increasing its quantity; any increase in quantity which seems likely to be repeated will lower the value of each unit more than in proportion to the increase."



To: Square_Dealings who wrote (14709)5/31/2004 10:26:55 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
Reuters
Recent comments on BOJ's monetary policy
Monday May 31, 4:06 am ET

TOKYO, May 31 (Reuters) - A recovery in Japan's economy has raised expectations that deflation may be nearing an end, which could bring with it a change in the Bank of Japan's "quantitative easing" policy much sooner than expected.


The BOJ has pledged that the policy will remain in place until the year-on-year change in the core consumer price index stabilises above zero percent, but recent comments by central bankers suggest they are shifting their focus to how to abandon the current policy framework.

Following is a summary of recent comments by BOJ officials:

- - - -

BOJ DEPUTY GOVERNOR KAZUMASA IWATA, MAY 31

"What is important is for most Policy Board members to hold expectations that we will not return to deflation," he said. "In my view, prices at plus 0.1 to 0.2 percent do not meet that requirement."

BOJ POLICY BOARD MEMBER KAZUO UEDA, MAY 26:

"We cannot rule out the possibility (for price changes) to be in positive territory, but the conditions are not there (for the BOJ) to have this as our main scenario," he said, referring to the outlook for prices in the next year on Nikkei-CNBC.

IWATA, MAY 21:

"We agreed that fighting deflation is crucial, and the government and the BOJ should work as one," he said after a meeting with government officials.

BOJ GOVERNOR TOSHIHIKO FUKUI, MAY 21:

"We are continuing with our quantitative easing policy. We would like to keep communicating with the markets appropriately."

FUKUI, MAY 20, SPEAKING AFTER UNEXPECTEDLY STRONG GDP DATA

"We have not changed our cautious view on consumer prices just because we saw those figures.

"Achieving a year-on-year rate of zero percent in CPI would just be a passing point. Eventually we will have to indicate clearly how we will conduct monetary policy beyond that point. But it is too early at this point to plan details of that."

BOJ MONTHLY REPORT ON MAY 20:

"Japan's economy continues to recover gradually and domestic demand is becoming firmer." The report kept the BOJ's overall assessment of the economy unchanged from April.

IWATA, MAY 16:

"Japan has been making efforts to conserve energy and to seek other sources of energy, so the potential impact on the economy has become much smaller," he said, referring to higher oil prices.

"Many people are speaking as if a hard landing in China is a certainty, but I think concerns on the outlook have been exaggerated."

BOJ POLICY BOARD MEMBER MIYAKO SUDA, MAY 15:

"Under zero rates, the effect of monetary policy is mainly transmitted through expectations. Therefore, we should start thinking of what kind of exit policy to take when our commitment (to beat deflation) is achieved...in order to prevent misunderstandings."

"If there is a consensus on what is an ideal rate of inflation, and if simply showing a target rate will boost the central bank's credibility as well as help to stabilise prices and control inflationary expectations...there is no reason for us not to adopt that."

FUKUI, MAY 13:

"The BOJ will continue its extremely easy monetary policy in order to support private-sector efforts to deal with structural problems.

"The Bank of Japan should be extremely careful to avoid sharp fluctuations in financial markets and to prevent any sudden discontinuities in market conditions.

"It is particularly crucial for the government to maintain sound fiscal discipline and consider market demand in issuing bonds, to achieve stability in long-term interest rates.

"If there is a spike in long-term yields, monetary policy alone may not be enough to suppress it."

BOJ POLICY BOARD MEMBER SHIN NAKAHARA, MAY 12:

"One way to stabilise market expectations when we change our quantitative easing policy regime would be to indicate beforehand what sort of inflation rate the central bank finds appropriate. I think that 1-2 percent would be an appropriate goal in the end.

"The problem is, after 2005 we should see some negative factors emerge, and we may see the economy peak towards the end of fiscal 2004.

"Although the economy is definitely recovering, it's not clear that we have overcome deflation. As such, it is crucial for us to patiently continue with our quantitative easing."

FUKUI, APRIL 28:

"It is hard to foresee consumer prices turning positive later in this fiscal year or into next year."

BOJ TWICE-YEARLY REPORT ON PRICES AND ECONOMY, APRIL 28:

The central projection, which excludes the highest and lowest forecasts of the nine-member Policy Board, was for the core CPI to fall 0.1 to 0.2 percent in 2004/05, ending next March 31, compared with a decline of 0.2 percent in 2003/04 -- the sixth straight fiscal year of deflation.

FUKUI, APRIL 26:

"I'm not saying we cannot share or respect the goals set by the government. But we need to avoid having two targets," he was quoted as saying in the minutes of a meeting with government officials at which he was asked about the BOJ's commitment to an economic growth target.

FUKUI, APRIL 24:

"Geopolitical risks themselves are changing every day. It is crucial to try to ensure that markets can absorb such risks," he told reporters at a G7 meeting in Washington.

SUDA, APRIL 21:

"It is difficult to conceive of the current strength in consumer spending continuing for an extended period.

"With growth strengthening in the short term, there will be growth in supply, but the demand gap won't shrink, meaning less upward pressure on prices. For this reason it is hard to see consumer prices stabilising above zero in the near future."

FUKUI, APRIL 19:

"Changes in consumer prices have been around zero on a year-on-year basis recently, but looking ahead the temporary factors that have been bolstering prices will recede and we should see them staying slightly negative for a while."

BOJ'S "TANKAN" SURVEY, APRIL 1:

The headline figure for large manufacturers' sentiment improved to plus 12 in March from a revised plus 7 in December. It was the highest level in the closely watched index since June 1997, and the fourth straight quarter of improvement.

Indices for small manufacturers and non-manufacturers also showed improvement, suggesting that an export-led recovery of the past year is beginning to spread out.