Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (288323)	5/31/2004 9:17:29 PM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

[Y]ou asked for documentation which he had already provided[.] LOL!!! You still don't get it. I asked - and am asking - for documentation as to the relevance of Clinton's statements to WMDs. Message 20179762 [T]he two quotes were in response to a separate point[.] If that's true, then why did you offer the link as documentation for the two quotes? Message 20179813 Message 20179862 Again, follow my question...nice...and...slowly: Message 20180809 You conflated the two -- that's a straw man to me. You can define it as you like, but if it's not a case where a position is misrepresented to gain advantage, it's not a straw man. Your attempting to make it sound as if I wanted a source for the two quotes is, in fact, a straw man. Your choosing to ignore that I have, several times now, made clear that I am seeking evidence that Clinton's words specifically addressed WMDs could also be perceived as an attempt to build an argumentative straw man. Again: are you retarded? If you are, it's okay, I'll let you off the hook. You just have to let me know. LPS5