SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (135268)6/2/2004 12:36:59 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I knew it was tongue in cheek, and I was just pulling your leg.

Downstream from the post you are responding to, upstream from this post, I posted a set of statistics about the Vietnam War. Over the course of 1964-1973, about 2.5 million Americans served in the military in Vietnam, out of a population of about 200 million. Probably less than 1%, actually, due to the fact that the 2.5 served over time. I am not good at explaining mathematical concepts, if Mq reads this he can do a far better job.

15 million men got deferments of one kind or another, which is a far larger number, not to mention the men who were 4F, for real, or just had sympathetic doctors. Given the family connection to the health care profession, I knew of sympathetic doctors, and used to take friends to see them.

If I, or someone I knew, was drafted, and wanted out, but did not know a way out, I would not blame them for being angry.

I just don't know anybody who wanted a way out who did not find it.

Volunteer armies are far better, IMO.

But maybe that's because I believe that some are willing to serve for reasons of their own.

I've done a lot of hard, dirty, dangerous things in my life, but being shot at isn't one of them.