Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (6835)	6/2/2004 11:20:41 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

I would like you to post this set of links to Searle Sennet on the Bush.... Mastermind thread. Searle has superior visual skills and can perhaps see more in this image than me. I'd love to get his (and your) opinion on this: hereisnewyork.org Select Image #2087 and use the full magnification feature. There is unquestionably something anomalous about the two pods appearing in this image. Here's the tread I discovered this image on: tinyurl.com <COPY> #2. Pic. same news pic as always, but this site hereisnewyork.org has a hi-res Viewpoint utility, allowing for X10 magnification without loss of resolution. There is a very strong case to be made that "flight 175" was in fact a fully loaded and disguised KC-767 tanker. No windows can be seen on the craft, and there are two short jets of some type vapor or mist shooting from under the plane, which may in fact be a pressure valve exhaust for a shielded missile / projectile. Further, there is clearly a round orifice located under the tail on the bottom of the plane's body, and this is not present on a regular 767, but it is present on a KC-767 tanker, in that it is the orfice which a fueling boom is connected. It would appear that the perps who carried this out did leave some clues, obviously feeling the risk that someone catching these smaller details was negligible. Criminals always leave clues and evidence behind. They are not always found, but there are always clues and evidence left behind. <END COPY> There are more image links on this thread..... While I'm generally extremely skeptical about visual evidence on the Net, this photograph #2087 certainly intrigues me. Particularly the discussion about the tail architecture which appears to be consistent with a military KC-767 tanker and inconsistent with the standard Boeing 767 tail configuration for commercial aircraft. Maybe I'm deluded. Maybe I'm dreaming. But the angle of attack on this craft made me think that the pilot had to be extremely skilled and sophisticated in order to put the craft into such a steep bank in order to spread the fire damage to as many floors as possible. Not the work of someone who could barely pass a test to fly a Cessna, IMHO. Best, Ray