SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Selectric II who wrote (8503)6/3/2004 2:33:38 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
Now Kerri can pay off his mortgage with campaign donations, nice deal for Kerri, glad he's enjoying the benefits of the Campaign Finance law he voted for.



To: Selectric II who wrote (8503)6/3/2004 2:38:48 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 90947
 
My understanding is that Kerry couldn't qualify for that loan and can't even make the monthly payments on his income.

It would depend on the type of loan and lender....certainly, this would not qualify as a conventional FannieMae/FreddiMac loan.....the very size is a problem.....but a lender holding this kind of loan in portfolio could easily make whatever deal they wanted.....the real question I suppose would be whether the loan constitutes a bribe since.....if Kerry is really unable to pay a market rate of interest.....its more of a gift or contribution....and there are limits on those......the note could be in the form of a bullet.....the whole amount payable at maturity.....many scenarios would work...and remember the Clintons did this type of financing as well with the Chappaqua residence......

J.



To: Selectric II who wrote (8503)6/7/2004 7:00:19 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
The Beacon Hill Nightmare
Some perspective on John Kerry's mortgage.

The story of Senator John Kerry's mortgaged home in Beacon Hill is worth looking at. What made the papers was the suggestion that his access to it, in usufruct, was threatened by the sheer size of the loan and the attendant obligations of financing it. All of this, of course, in the context of his need for money to finance the ongoing campaign for the presidency.

There are several perspectives one needs in order to evaluate the problem of Mr. Kerry's mortgage. The first, of course, is that if you own a house valuable enough to warrant a loan of $6 million, you are living, by common standards, in an economic stratosphere, the implications of which require adjusting to normal standards of evaluation. If you hock the Hope Diamond for $10 million, attention focuses on your owing $10 million whereas, properly, it should focus on your owning the Hope Diamond.

Senator Kerry's widely publicized point is that he has had to finance his campaign by using his own resources, which are limited. But of course that is Hope Diamond talk. If a bank lends you $6 million, it knows it's going to get the money back.

How? Well, Senator Kerry is not wealthy, but he does have undisclosed assets. That is, assets undisclosed to the public, but not to the bank. All the bank needs is approximately $200,000 per year in interest payments, which is a little more than Senator Kerry's income as a senator. This point is mentioned in the news stories.

Where else would the bankers look, if they thought themselves threatened? Well, of course, to the property on which the loan was made, namely the house on Beacon Hill. There is a difficulty, which is that the house is jointly owned by Mr. Kerry and his wife. She has to be careful, even though she made out a prenuptial agreement with John. If he divorced her, one assumes, she would keep the house, to say nothing of her fortune.

Bear this poignancy in mind, that Mrs. Kerry is not permitted, under the law, to give Mr. Kerry more than $2,000 when he is running for office. Now some may classify this as an example of the problems of the idle rich. But this would be flippant. It is a big enough story of a human plight, to make the press worldwide.

Now pity for Mr. Kerry is immediately evoked by the circumstances of the mortgage. It is not as if he was taking $6 million to buy himself a G-V jet. No, he was using $6 million to pay the staff of his campaign and take out ads, all of this in anticipation of the returns in Iowa and New Hampshire. It added up to this, that returns from his campaign weren't large enough to satisfy his inclination to advance the cause of the campaign by additional advertising.

Now if he had lost out in Iowa, he'd have needed to reduce spending, which would have given his most resolute backers a challenge, namely to continue to support John Kerry at least to the point of giving him back his home on Beacon Hill. But if he did well in Iowa, as indeed he did, everybody could assume that the flow of money would not only continue, but increase. The publicity attached to the mortgage can only have served the cause of alerting his donors to the need to save not only the nation, but the house.

This is because current law denies to a candidate the right to repay past loans from money that comes in after the operative political date (in this case, the national convention in late July). After that, you can only use $250,000 of campaign contributions to repay old debts, and $250,000 comes to only a little over one year's interest on the Beacon Hill loan.

So it has to be cleared up before then, Kerry supporters are being told.

Campaigning for president in l956, Governor Adlai Stevenson crossed his legs while sitting on a chair on the dais, waiting to give his speech and a photographer shot a picture of his shoe. Lo!-there was a hole in his shoe.

That shoe with the hole became a talisman of Stevenson for President. Tiny gold and copper replicas were made to pin on to your handbag or lapel. What it said was: Vote for this man who, though so straitened as not to be able to afford to repair his shoes, walks on day after day, wearing out life's shoe leather, in the cause of America.

Get it?

John Kerry for President devoutly hopes you do.
nationalreview.com



To: Selectric II who wrote (8503)6/7/2004 7:04:27 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 90947
 
Kerry's Campaign Mortgage Questioned

WRKO Boston talk radio host Howie Carr is questioning whether Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry was given special treatment when he obtained a $6.4 million mortgage last December on the Beacon Hill townhouse he owns jointly with his wife to rescue his then-financially strapped campaign.

"I don't think that the bank should have given Kerry that big of a mortgage under the usual regulations," Carr told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg on Sunday.

"When you figure up the payments and the interest rate on the note, it's going to cost him $350,000 a year to pay off the note," the Boston talker explained, noting that Kerry's annual salary as a senator was less that half that amount.

"How can any bank vice president sign off on that," said Carr, "unless they do it with a wink and a nod and say, 'Well, the one who's really going to take care of it is Teresa" - Kerry's ketchup-heiress wife, who is reportedly worth $550 million.

Federal Election Commission regulations make it illegal for Mrs. Heinz Kerry to contribute more than $2,000 to her husband's presidential campaign.

Carr said also that Kerry's share of the Beacon Hill townhouse was likely inflated in order to boost the amount of cash he could borrow.

"City Hall records show that the mansion is actually only assessed at $6 million," he told Malzberg. "And yet the bank gave Kerry a mortgage of $6 million [the full amount], even though he only owns a half share under communal property rights."
newsmax.com



To: Selectric II who wrote (8503)6/7/2004 7:09:27 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Kerry set to loan campaign $6 million
Like Dean, Kerry has given up public funding

Wednesday, December 24, 2003 Posted: 10:06 AM EST (1506 GMT)
John Kerry is preparing to loan his campaign more than $6 million financed by a mortgage on his family's home in Boston.

BOSTON, Massachusetts (CNN) -- Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry is getting ready to loan his campaign more than $6 million financed by a mortgage on his family's Boston home.

"Sen. John Kerry has finalized plans to loan his presidential campaign over $6 million. The personal loan was secured through a mortgage on his share of the family's home in Boston," said a statement from Mary Beth Cahill, Kerry's campaign manager.

"Sen. Kerry's personal commitment to the race is unquestioned. Sen. Kerry is confident in the energy and direction of his campaign as we head into the New Year, when voters begin to go to caucuses and primaries," Cahill said.

"We are running in every state and in every corner of the country. We are now on the ballot in 31 states with campaign operations in 33 states run by staff and volunteers."

On December 18, Kerry's aides announced he had loaned his campaign $850,000 and would loan the campaign more in the future. (Full story)

Kerry -- who is running behind Howard Dean in most polls -- gave up public funding and the limits on spending that come with it in order to keep up with Dean. (Dean, Clark spar over vice president talk)

Kerry and Howard Dean are the only Democratic candidates to opt out of public financing.

But Kerry has not been able to raise funds as prolifically as Howard Dean.

In the third quarter, Kerry raised just under $4 million, compared to $14.8 million raised by Howard Dean.

Kerry's third quarter was down significantly from the first quarter when he raised almost $7.5 million.

Under the campaign finance rules, Kerry can spend his own money from the fortune he shares with his wife, heiress Teresa Heinz Kerry, who inherited around $500 million from her first husband, the late Sen. John Heinz, the heir to the Heinz ketchup fortune.
cnn.com

BUT if the house is community property, only half of it is his, right?