Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (6868)	6/5/2004 1:38:18 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20039

One point that would be difficult to explain with the "Home Run" theory is the debris field of flight 93. The debris field shows conclusively that the plane was breaking up long before it hit the ground. I can only think of three possible ways to explain the fact. 1. It was shot down. 2. There was a bomb on board. 3. There was some chance mechanical failure of unknown origin. 1 and 2 are kind of hard to explain if all that was necessary to cause a crash was to fly the plane into the ground. It would be interesting to know "if" home run was installed on the planes, and "if" it was being controlled from outside the plane, "if" it had a failsafe feature to prevent maneuvers likely to crash the plane; for example too steep a descent. Lots of "if"s and not much in the way of public information or investigations. Changing the subject, this site has some interesting stuff on the WTC7 collapse: wtc7.net