SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Valley Girl who wrote (135512)6/3/2004 7:05:22 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Daym I like your style.



To: Valley Girl who wrote (135512)6/3/2004 11:23:45 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 281500
 
I read an article, can remember where, maybe 'Nature'. Coastal estimates where in the Billions of cubic yards on the coastal areas alone. Thousands of years supply. More realistic then cold fusion. But why spend the money when oil fossil fuels are still cheaper. Remember then is a ton on gold around the Potomac River, mineable at 1000 an oz.



To: Valley Girl who wrote (135512)6/4/2004 9:23:07 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
At least for now, I've got methane hydroxide classed in the fantasy category right alongside using "Mister Fusion" to get energy from bananas.

I believe you mean Methane Hydrate. It's a great idea, once someone figures out how to effectively mine the stuff without causing an general "melting" of the deposit and releasing the greenhouse gas into the atmosphere.

Hawk


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News