SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (28255)6/3/2004 8:30:14 PM
From: WaynersRespond to of 81568
 
Absolutely. Fuel cells are safer alternative, but when it comes to compressed hydrogen, nothing is completely safe. Comes down to probability of a mishap and the severity of the credible mishaps. You only install safety measures to counter the severe and probably mishaps.



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (28255)6/4/2004 1:31:15 AM
From: Alan SmitheeRespond to of 81568
 
H2 is one of the most dangerous chemicals around. It is a very small molecule so it leaks easily. It also has a very broad range of explosive limits

Yep. But they can solve that problem, can't they? <ggg>

I can see it now, Hindenburg Hydrogen stations every 50 miles on I-5.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News