SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (3452)6/4/2004 2:51:08 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 7936
 
Do I think it's right, or do I think it should be illegal?

I'm not sure I would say it is right but I don't think it is a gross injustice, or a violation of anyone's rights or something that should be illegal.

Edit - Or to put it another way I think the bar owner is within his rights to charge whatever he wants to anyone. It might not be nice to charge a lot more at least without a good reason (but thier are good reasons behind ladies night), but if he wanted to charge me more, or white people more, or men, or any group I would not try to sue him or register a formal complaint with the government, and not just because I would "let it slide" but because I think it would be wrong to use the power of government in this way.

Tim



To: Lane3 who wrote (3452)6/14/2004 6:24:03 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7936
 
Top Court Rejects Atheist's Challenge to Pledge

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An atheist's attempt to remove the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance failed on Monday when the U.S. Supreme Court avoided the constitutional question and ruled he could not bring the challenge on behalf of his daughter.

The ruling in one of the most important cases of the term was based on the technicality that Californian Michael Newdow could not bring the case because he did not have legal control over the now 10-year-old girl. It left open the possibility of future challenges...

wireservice.wired.com



To: Lane3 who wrote (3452)8/10/2004 5:47:02 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 7936
 
War makes for divergent recollections

newsday.com