Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : 5spl -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (1445)	6/4/2004 3:20:33 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2534

Right, the case was argued (with lawyers) before a state agency director instead of a court judge. That probably creates an appelate problem (no higher court?). Not sure why they did that; I have no idea how NJ law operates. They'll probably have to take it to the people for a referendum. Can't wait to see that as a ballot initiative — let's see, we have taxes, schools, elected officials, muni bonds, roads, other important legal stuff and ... oh yes, "Should we or should we not, the People of the State of New Jersey, by official elective sanction as provided by the Constitution of our Commonwealth — let chix into bars for free?"