SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (48708)6/4/2004 3:44:11 PM
From: Neeka  Respond to of 793570
 
the one that said opposition to Bush is anti-American; or the one that said opposition to Bush was traitorous. Or . . . . .

I've heard this before, and it reminds me of a lot of other complaints. Like the 2000 election and the people who absolutely refuse to accept the results of five investigations...some by left leaning sources.... and the nearly identical conclusions that were reached, seriously. Or the whining over actually accepting a United States Supreme Court decision that they find personally disgusting. Or the people that just cannot stop talking about the Clinton years and their perception of Nirvana. Or John F. Kennedy and their longing for the return of Camelot. I voluntarily abandon what little television I do watch during that time frame because of the constant barrage around Nov. 22.

Who ARE these people making this ridiculous point? Could you please provide their names and the circumstances under which they may have uttered such nonsense.....links....anything...... so I can see for myself who they are?

And please don't link me to Ari Fleischer...we're all familiar with what he said. I would like to know who it is.......other than him......that tries to validate such idiocy.

TIA

M



To: JohnM who wrote (48708)6/4/2004 4:00:49 PM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793570
 
I must have missed it. Was that the one that said opposition to Bush is anti-American; or the one that said opposition to Bush was traitorous. Or . . . . .

I was thinking of this one...

Most would vote for Pol Pot over Bush.
Michael Moore types would vote for a Bin Laden ticket over Bush...



To: JohnM who wrote (48708)6/4/2004 4:24:29 PM
From: Rollcast...  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793570
 
Was that the one that said opposition to Bush is anti-American; or the one that said opposition to Bush was traitorous.

No need to lie, professor. The point being made that the core of your party is currently driven by hatred for Bush. Once again, you failed to refute it.

You should try a little harder to be accurate - it might help with that flaming bias problem.



To: JohnM who wrote (48708)6/4/2004 6:54:53 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 793570
 
John, precisely who was it who said, "opposition to Bush
is anti-American"? And exactly who said, "opposition to
Bush was traitorous"?

Please name names & give links. I really want to know who
these folks really are.

TIA