Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (48947)	6/6/2004 9:50:25 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793959

Hi kholt, I have been thinking about that too. You and Andrew are right, shadows can have influence. I am not at all concerned about how GWB looks in the shadow of Ronald Reagan. Kerry on the other hand looks terrible in the shadow of Teddy Kennedy. uw

To: Lane3 who wrote (48947)	6/6/2004 11:21:29 AM
From: Andrew N. Cothran	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793959

So, Kholt, in your view, the "fact" that this week's "Remembering Reagan" " . . .may not be a good thing for Bush because it may cause Bush to seem lacking in comparison. . ." has no particular relevance. It is merely your thought, expressed as a surmise, with no particular significance to the contemporary scene in which Bush is pleased to campaign. In other words, whatever inference one makes from reading your expressed thought is beside the point, leaving you to continue to think what you think without intending that any one reading it reflect on its relevance to the contemporary scene even though the thought itself refers to the contemporary scene. Interesting pov to say the least.