Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (580895)	6/6/2004 9:50:23 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

And David Kaye said that in the area of research and development of WMD, the situation found was far more dangerous than anything suspected and he stated PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH was 100% correct in getting rid of j-f-sillykins soul-mate, saddam. "A small amount of the nerve agent sarin was found in a shell that exploded in Iraq, the U.S. army said Monday in the first announcement of discovery of any of the weapons on which Washington made its case for war," reports Reuters. In the Washington game of pulling back the goal posts whenever the opposing team gets close to scoring, the Democrats will dutifully downplay this report. Recall their selective reading of David Kay's report. They ignored Kay's finding that up until the beginning of the war Iraqi scientists were "actively working to produce a biological weapon using the poison ricin." Monday's news confirms what Kay reported to an indifferent Congress: "We know that terrorists were passing through Iraq. And now we know that there was little control over Iraq's weapons capabilities. I think it shows that Iraq was a very dangerous place. The country had the technology, the ability to produce, and there were terrorist groups passing through the country -- and no central control." The Democrats seized upon elements of Kay's report to advance their claim that Iraq under Saddam Hussein was less dangerous than assumed. But Kay was trying to explain to them that Iraq was more dangerous than even Bush's pre-war picture allowed: "I actually think what we learned during the inspection made Iraq a more dangerous place, potentially, than, in fact, we thought it was even before the war." freerepublic.com

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (580895)	6/6/2004 11:02:03 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"No where near proven?????? Are you nuts?" It is nowhere near proven. That you dishonestly claim that it is proven is laughable. Not surprising, but laughable. "And violation of UN resolutions does not justify war" When they are the conditions that ended a war, damn strait they do. We let him get away with it until the world became to obvioulsy dangerous. That you will attack a man as Hitler because he does this is far more telling of your mindset than anything else. But you are a hater, so again, not surprising. If you lost your keys, and did not find them, does that mean you didn't have them? It does with your stupid Bush hating logic. And even though the serin that blew up the other day wasn't a massive stockpile, doesn't that indicate there were some WMD's? Of course it does. Your a hater that wanted Saddam left in power and Bush kicked out. Neither has happened (or will happen), and it has made you even more bitter than you were. What a miserable existance.