Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richnorth who wrote (29233)	6/7/2004 12:41:30 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 81568

Thank you Richnorth. It is pretty frustrating to see folks come on this thread and refusing to engage in fruitful discussions. Often times we end up rehashing the same things we have discussed on this board. Thanks for your patience in posting that. I thought that lorne would have known all this. We have folks on this thread harp on the fact that the oil for food was a scandal and that people who benefitted from it such as Saddam and his cronies was what got Bushies mad and hence that was one of the principal reasons for their decision to invade Iraq. I am trying to turn around and tell those folks that they need to look at the US (Halliburton scandal) first before we go around accusing others. And that is why I used the oft used phrase “the Pot calling the kettle black”. And our good friend Lorne comes back with all those questions. So in summary I would say that if Saddam deserved to go because of the oil for food program, then it is the same scandal scenario that would require Bush and Cheney to leave office in November 2004.