SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (80677)6/8/2004 9:38:28 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I not only did not misunderstand but the opposition was shown to be in error. No discrimination what so ever, that is what you refused to recognize. ... nor was clinton impeached for having sex, but peops will continue to insist that he was because they can't admit their initial mistake in wrongly supporting him, and they had a lot of extra baggage attached to the issue making it even more difficult. You made the wrong assumption at the start and you were never willing to consider that. So... here we are again.



To: Solon who wrote (80677)6/8/2004 12:10:37 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
You cannot argue for discrimination.

Certainly you can. I wouldn't but I don't think such arguments should be illegal or otherwise forcibly disallowed.

More importantly you can argue for allowing some discrimination without actually arguing for discrimination, just as someone might argue for the right of a communist or nazi party to exist without arguing for communism or nazism.

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News