SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dumbmoney who wrote (136043)6/9/2004 2:48:57 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Which Scott Ritter would that be? The one who warned us against Saddam's reconstituted programs in 1999 - or the one who said in 2001 that Saddam had nothing at all - after he took $400,000 of Saddam's money?



To: dumbmoney who wrote (136043)6/9/2004 9:58:06 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Gee Mr. Hawk, isn't it true that Scott Ritter was right about Iraq's WMD?

No, it's not. Ritter never discusses the ongoing biological R&D programs that David Kay discovered.

And on the issue of WMD stockpiles, it would depend on what year you're referring to. In 1998, he testified to the Senate that he believed Iraq still had WMDs in the country.

Was he wrong then?

Hawk


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News