Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (8778)	6/9/2004 10:33:35 AM
From: Selectric II	Respond to of 90947

Yes. And I certainly can picture a p*ssed-off France losing its sweetheart under-the-table oil deal with Saddam, as well as oil industry revenues (Schlumberger), accusing us of wanting the oil, the income, and the business (Haliburton).

To: mph who wrote (8778)	6/10/2004 9:52:18 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

The US government officially decided that the war on Iraq was necessary six months before September 11th. The one and only reason for this was to improve Western access to Iraqi oil. President Bush’s Cabinet agreed in April 2001 that ’Iraq remains a destabilising influence to the flow of oil to international markets from the Middle East’ and because this is an unacceptable risk to the US ’military intervention’ is necessary. hartford-hwp.com Much more proof here: hartford-hwp.com thedebate.org Orca