SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (190123)6/9/2004 12:58:37 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577987
 
>>>>>>>>>Now, it's too late. You are right, "The death of bin Laden, TOMORROW, would not change the war on terror one iota." They've grown, they've spread and they've evolved, we let the cancer spread and mutate.

This is just bullshit. No unbiased military observer has suggested that the war in Iraq has had ANYTHING to with what is happening with bin Laden. And I think you know it.



To: Road Walker who wrote (190123)6/9/2004 3:59:55 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1577987
 
re: The bigger question is why didn't Clinton get him instead of refusing several attempts to have him "handed over"?

So you are saying Bush is as bad as Clinton?

No, he's doing the blame game. Bush hasn't been to pull off defeating al Qa'ida so they have to blame someone for their incompetency.

And no, Bush is not as bad as Clinton; no one could be as bad as Clinton in DR's eyes.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News